CARC 167 Active

CO-167: Diagnosis Not Covered

TL;DR

The diagnosis is not covered — it is a contractual write-off. Verify coding accuracy and resubmit, or appeal with medical necessity documentation.

Action
Verify & Resubmit
Who Pays
Provider
Appeal
Yes
Patient Impact
None
Disclaimer
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional billing advice. Always verify information against your payer contracts and current coding guidelines. Consult a certified billing specialist for specific claim issues.

What Does CO-167 Mean?

CO-167 is the most common pairing and represents a contractual write-off. The payer has determined that the diagnosis is not covered under the plan, and the provider must absorb the loss. You cannot bill the patient for the CO-167 amount. Your primary path is to verify the diagnosis code, correct coding errors, and resubmit. If the code is accurate, check the payer's policy to understand the exclusion and either appeal or identify an alternative covered diagnosis that the documentation supports.

When CARC 167 appears on a remittance, the payer has denied the claim because the diagnosis or diagnoses listed on the claim are not covered by the patient's insurance plan. The payer is not saying the service was coded incorrectly or that the provider is ineligible — it is specifically flagging the diagnosis itself as outside the plan's covered conditions.

However, a significant portion of CARC 167 denials are actually coding errors rather than genuine coverage exclusions. Industry data from Experian Health indicates that 42% of all claim denials are caused by coding inaccuracies. A missing 7th character on an ICD-10 code, an incorrect code that maps to a non-covered condition, or an outdated code set can all trigger CARC 167 when the underlying diagnosis is actually covered. Before accepting this denial at face value, always verify the coding accuracy against the clinical documentation.

When the denial is legitimate, it typically involves plan-specific exclusions for cosmetic conditions, experimental treatments, certain mental health conditions, fertility services, or pre-existing conditions under older plan types. The financial impact depends entirely on the group code. CO-167 is a contractual write-off that the provider absorbs. PR-167 shifts the balance to the patient, but only if proper advance notification (ABN for Medicare, or similar payer-specific waiver) was obtained before the service. The 835 Healthcare Policy Identification Segment (Loop 2110 REF) often points to the specific NCD, LCD, or payer policy behind the denial — checking this field can save significant research time.

Common Causes

Cause Frequency
Diagnosis excluded from plan coverage The patient's insurance plan specifically excludes coverage for the submitted diagnosis. Common exclusions include cosmetic conditions, experimental treatments, pre-existing conditions under certain plan types, and diagnoses related to non-covered services Most Common
Incorrect or incomplete ICD-10 coding The wrong diagnosis code was submitted, or the code lacks the required specificity (missing 4th, 5th, 6th, or 7th characters). The actual diagnosis may be covered, but the code on the claim does not match a covered condition. 42% of denials are caused by coding inaccuracies according to Experian Health data Most Common
Payer policy change excluding the diagnosis The payer updated its coverage policies and the diagnosis that was previously covered is no longer eligible for reimbursement. The provider may not have been aware of the policy change Common
Diagnosis does not support medical necessity The payer determined that the submitted diagnosis does not meet their medical necessity criteria for the billed procedure or service, even though the diagnosis itself is a recognized code Common
Missing or insufficient documentation of medical necessity The clinical documentation does not adequately support why the service was necessary for the submitted diagnosis, even though the diagnosis may be covered in other contexts Common
Outdated or incorrect insurance information The patient's insurance was not verified before the visit, and the submitted plan does not cover the diagnosed condition — the patient may have a different plan that would cover it Occasional

How to Resolve

Verify the ICD-10 diagnosis code is accurate and specific, check plan coverage, and either correct and resubmit or appeal with clinical documentation.

  1. Audit the ICD-10 code Verify the diagnosis code on the claim is accurate, current, and coded to the highest level of specificity. Compare against the clinical documentation.
  2. Check the payer's coverage policy Review the payer's LCD, NCD, or coverage determination to understand why the diagnosis is excluded. Check the 835 Loop 2110 REF segment for policy references.
  3. Correct and resubmit if coding was wrong If the code was incorrect, update it to the accurate diagnosis code and resubmit with supporting clinical documentation.
  4. Appeal with clinical evidence if coding was correct If the diagnosis code is accurate and you believe it should be covered, file an appeal with medical records, medical necessity arguments, and references to applicable coverage policies.

Common RARC Pairings

The RARC code tells you exactly what triggered the CO-167:

RARC Description
N130 Alert: You may need to review plan documents to determine if this diagnosis is excluded from coverage.
N381 Alert: Consult your contractual agreement for restrictions, billing, and payment information related to non-covered diagnoses.
N386 Alert: This decision was based on a National Coverage Determination (NCD) or Local Coverage Determination (LCD).

How to Prevent CO-167

General Prevention

Also Filed As

The same CARC 167 may appear with different Group Codes:

Related Denial Codes

Sources

  1. https://www.mdclarity.com/denial-code/167
  2. https://medibillmd.com/blog/co-167-denial-code/
  3. https://myfcbilling.com/co-167-denial-code-diagnosis-is-not-covered/
  4. Codes maintained by X12. Visit x12.org for official definitions.