CARC 170 Active

CO-170: Payment Denied — Provider Type Not Eligible

TL;DR

The provider type is not eligible to bill this service. Correct the NPI or taxonomy code, rebill under an eligible provider, or appeal with credentialing proof.

Action
Verify & Resubmit
Who Pays
Provider
Appeal
Yes
Patient Impact
None
Disclaimer
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional billing advice. Always verify information against your payer contracts and current coding guidelines. Consult a certified billing specialist for specific claim issues.

What Does CO-170 Mean?

CO-170 is the most common pairing and means the provider type restriction results in a contractual write-off. The provider cannot bill the patient for the CO-170 amount. In most cases, the resolution involves correcting the billing identifiers (NPI, taxonomy) or rebilling under an eligible supervising provider. If the provider is genuinely ineligible for the service, the amount is a loss unless the service can be re-rendered or co-signed by an eligible provider.

When CARC 170 appears on a remittance, the payer has denied the claim because the type of provider who performed or billed the service is not authorized to receive payment for that specific procedure. This is not a question about whether the service was medically necessary or properly coded — the payer is saying that the provider's credentials, specialty, or enrollment status does not qualify them to bill this particular CPT or HCPCS code.

Payers maintain lists of which provider types are authorized for specific services. A nurse practitioner may be able to bill evaluation and management codes but not certain surgical procedures. A physical therapist may be restricted from billing certain diagnostic services. These restrictions vary significantly between payers and are often rooted in state scope-of-practice laws, payer contracts, and Medicare's provider type requirements. The RARC most frequently paired with this code is N95 ('This provider type/provider specialty may not bill this service'), which confirms the provider-type mismatch.

The most common resolution involves correcting the billing to use the right provider's NPI. In many cases, the service was legitimately provided but billed under the wrong provider — for example, a mid-level provider billed independently when the service should have been billed incident-to a supervising physician. In other cases, the rendering provider's enrollment with the payer may need to be updated to reflect the correct specialty or credentials. Always check the 835 Loop 2110 REF Healthcare Policy Identification Segment, which points you directly to the payer policy that triggered the denial.

Common Causes

Cause Frequency
Provider type not authorized for the billed service The payer restricts certain CPT/HCPCS codes to specific provider types (e.g., physicians only), and the claim was billed by a provider type not authorized for that service (NP, PA, CRNA, therapist, etc.) Most Common
Provider credentialing or enrollment issues The billing provider is not properly credentialed or enrolled with the payer for the specialty required to bill the specific service. The provider may be enrolled but under a specialty that does not include the billed procedure Most Common
Incident-to billing requirements not met The service was billed under a supervising physician's NPI using incident-to rules, but the requirements for incident-to billing were not met (e.g., physician was not on-site, the service was not an integral part of the physician's care plan) Common
Billing under the wrong NPI or taxonomy code The claim was submitted with an NPI or taxonomy code that does not match the provider type required for the billed service. The rendering provider's taxonomy may indicate a specialty not eligible for the procedure code Common
State scope-of-practice limitations The service was provided by a mid-level provider (NP, PA) in a state where their scope of practice does not include the billed service, or the payer follows state-specific rules that restrict the provider type Occasional
Payer policy change restricting provider types The payer updated its policy to restrict which provider types can bill certain services, and the provider was previously eligible but is no longer under the updated policy Occasional

How to Resolve

Identify the provider type restriction, verify credentials and enrollment, and either correct the billing identifiers or rebill under an eligible provider.

  1. Check the payer policy Use the Loop 2110 REF and RARC N95 to identify the specific policy. Look up which provider types are authorized for the billed CPT/HCPCS code.
  2. Verify and correct provider identifiers Check the NPI, taxonomy code, and enrollment status. Correct any mismatches and resubmit the claim.
  3. Use incident-to billing if applicable If the service was provided by a mid-level and qualifies for incident-to billing, verify the requirements are met and rebill under the supervising physician.
  4. Appeal with enrollment proof If the provider should be eligible, appeal with credentialing documentation, enrollment confirmation, and the relevant payer policy.

Common RARC Pairings

The RARC code tells you exactly what triggered the CO-170:

RARC Description
N95 This provider type/provider specialty may not bill this service.
N381 Alert: Consult your contractual agreement for restrictions, billing, and payment information related to provider type eligibility.

How to Prevent CO-170

General Prevention

Also Filed As

The same CARC 170 may appear with different Group Codes:

Related Denial Codes

Sources

  1. https://www.mdclarity.com/denial-code/170
  2. https://imedclaims.com/co-170-denial-code/
  3. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/ohs/health-it-advisory-council/apcd-advisory-group/data-submission-guide-workgroup/meeting-materials/6-30-22/carc-codes_final.pdf
  4. Codes maintained by X12. Visit x12.org for official definitions.